Analyze a Manifest Heywood Case

After reporting your findings, the adoption group recreated their survey to measure two factors: how effective their online story posts were in goodstory and how much an inperson interaction mattered. The new data is loaded under adoptsurvey. In this exercise, you will look for a Heywood cases on one of the manifest variables, rather than on the latent variable.

Diese Übung ist Teil des Kurses

Structural Equation Modeling with lavaan in R

Anleitung zur Übung

Analyze the updated data adoptsurvey for the two factor adopt.model with the cfa() function.
Watch for warnings after the cfa() has been analyzed.
Use the summary() function to explore which manifest variable is problematic.

Interaktive Übung

Vervollständige den Beispielcode, um diese Übung erfolgreich abzuschließen.

# Build the model
adopt.model <- 'goodstory =~ pictures + background + loveskids
inperson =~ energy + wagstail + playful'

# Analyze the model and include the data argument
adopt.fit <- cfa(___)

# Summarize the model to view the negative variances

Code bearbeiten und ausführen

Diese Übung ist Teil des Kurses

Structural Equation Modeling with lavaan in R

Hohe SchwierigkeitSchwierigkeitsgrad

4.9+

Kurs kostenlos starten

In this chapter, you will dive into creating your first structural equation model with lavaan. You will learn important terminology, how to build, and run models. You will create a one-factor model of mental test abilities using the classic Holzinger and Swineford (1939) dataset.

Exercise 1: Model Specification Exercise 2: Build Text Speed Model Exercise 3: Build Political Democracy Model Exercise 4: Model Analysis Exercise 5: Analyze Text Speed Model Exercise 6: Summarize Political Democracy Exercise 7: Model Assessment Exercise 8: Examine Standardized Loadings Exercise 9: Explore Fit Indices Exercise 10: Examine Political Democracy

In this chapter, you will expand your skills in lavaan to creating multi-factor models. We will improve the one-factor models from the last chapter by creating multiple latent variables in the classic Holzinger and Swineford (1939) dataset.

Exercise 1: Multifactor Specification Exercise 2: Create a Zero df Model Exercise 3: Fix the Zero df Model Exercise 4: Build a Multi-Factor Model Exercise 5: Summarize the Multi-Factor Model Exercise 6: Model Structure Exercise 7: Three-Factor Model with Zero Correlation Exercise 8: Create a Direct Path Exercise 9: Modification Indices Exercise 10: Check Model Variance Exercise 11: Examine Modification Indices Exercise 12: Model Comparison Exercise 13: Compare Two Models Exercise 14: Select Specific Fit Indices

Structural equation models do not always run smoothly, and in this chapter, you will learn how to troubleshoot Heywood cases which are common errors. You will also learn how to diagram your model in R using the semPlot library.

Exercise 1: Heywood Cases on the Latent Variable Exercise 2: Analyze a Latent Heywood Case Exercise 3: Fix the Latent Heywood Model Exercise 4: Heywood Cases on the Manifest Variables Exercise 5: Analyze a Manifest Heywood Case

Aktuelle Übung

Exercise 6: Fix the Manifest Heywood Model Exercise 7: Create Diagrams with semPaths()Exercise 8: Basic SEM Diagram Exercise 9: Edit the Layout Exercise 10: Edit the Labels

This chapter examines the WAIS-III IQ Scale and its structural properties. You will use your skills from the first three chapters to create various models of the WAIS-III, troubleshoot errors in those models, and create diagrams of the final model.

Exercise 1: Model the WAIS-III IQ Scale Exercise 2: Create a Four-Factor Model Exercise 3: Update the Model Exercise 4: Diagram the Final Model Exercise 5: Update the WAIS-III Model Exercise 6: Add Paths to Improve Fit Exercise 7: Compare Models Exercise 8: A Hierarchical Model of IQ Exercise 9: Create a Hierarchical Model Exercise 10: Diagram the Hierarchical Model Exercise 11: Course Wrap Up