Governance documentation and traceability
1. Governance documentation and traceability
Hi Alex, we've talked about the legal requirements for documentation. What kinds of documents are essential for AI governance? I’ve heard of “model cards” and “impact assessments.” What are they, and why do they matter? Alex: Those are excellent questions, Jordan. Let's start with model cards. A model card is a standardized summary of an AI model’s intended use, performance, training data (including biases), limitations, and responsible AI factors like fairness and transparency. Jordan: So, it's like a nutritional label for an AI model? Giving you all the key ingredients and potential side effects? Alex: That's a great analogy! It helps stakeholders understand the model’s capabilities, risks, and promotes transparency. Model cards are becoming increasingly important for demonstrating due diligence and meeting documentation requirements. Jordan: And what about impact assessments? What do those entail? Alex: AI impact assessments are forward-looking evaluations of potential societal, ethical, and legal consequences of deployment.This includes considering impacts on individuals, groups, and the environment. The goal is to identify and prevent negative outcomes. Jordan: So, a model card tells you about the model as it is, and an impact assessment tries to predict its broader effects? Alex: Precisely. It involves a multi-disciplinary team assessing risks like privacy, discrimination, environmental impact, and human rights—especially for large models. The goal is to develop a plan to address any identified risks. Jordan: That sounds like a very thorough process. Audit logs were also mentioned in a previous lesson. How do they fit into governance documentation? Alex: Audit logs record an AI system’s activities throughout its lifecycle.This includes data inputs, model changes, deployment decisions, user interactions, and access records. They are crucial for demonstrating compliance, investigating incidents, and ensuring accountability. They provide the "who, what, when, and how" of actions taken on the system. Jordan: So, model cards, impact assessments, and audit logs are all different pieces of the documentation puzzle for AI governance. Alex: Exactly. And it's not enough to just create these documents in isolation. It's essential to map model lifecycle activities to these governance artifacts. Jordan: What do you mean by that? Alex: Each stage - from ideation to monitoring - should include matching governance documentation. For example, during the training phase, you'd log training data, process, and bias mitigation, feeding into the model card and impact assessment. During deployment, you'd record the deployment process in the audit logs and ensure the model card is updated with deployment details. During monitoring, performance metrics and any detected anomalies would be logged in the audit trail and could trigger a review documented in an updated impact assessment or model card. Jordan: So, the documents aren't static; they evolve with the AI system? Alex: Absolutely. They should be living documents that are updated as the AI system changes and as we learn more about its performance and impact. This brings us to the crucial concept of traceability. Jordan: Traceability? How does that relate? Alex: Traceability tracks the history, use, and decisions related to an AI system’s data and models. It's about creating clear links between the different stages of the AI lifecycle and the corresponding governance artifacts. Jordan: Why is traceability so important for governance? Alex: Traceability is a pillar of auditability and control. If you can trace the data used to train a model, the changes made to the model over time, and the decisions made during deployment, it becomes much easier to audit the system for compliance, identify the root cause of any issues, and demonstrate that appropriate controls are in place. Jordan: So, if there's a problem with an AI's output, traceability allows you to go back and see where things might have gone wrong, whether it was the data, the model updates, or something else? Alex: Precisely. It provides a clear line of sight throughout the entire process. Without traceability, it's very difficult to oversee and manage the risks associated with AI effectively. It's essential for accountability and building trust in AI systems. Jordan: Model cards, impact assessments, audit logs, and mapping them to the lifecycle for traceability… It sounds like a significant undertaking, but absolutely crucial for responsible AI governance. Alex: It is, Jordan. Implementing these practices helps to build trustworthy, transparent AI systems.2. Let's practice!
Create Your Free Account
or
By continuing, you accept our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy and that your data is stored in the USA.