Get startedGet started for free

Operationalizing governance workflows

1. Operationalizing governance workflows

Hello again! In this video, we’ll focus on embedding AI governance into daily operations through technical workflows like MLOps and DataOps. We’ll cover how tools like checklists and registries fit in, and compare lightweight vs. heavyweight governance approaches. Joe: Hi Simla, now, how do organizations actually implement that strategy in their day-to-day operations? Simla: That's the critical step of operationalization, Joe. Governance can't be a separate, after-the-fact process; it needs to be embedded into existing workflows like MLOps (Machine Learning Operations), DataOps (Data Operations), or the standard model development lifecycle. Think of it as building safety checks directly into the production line, rather than inspecting everything at the very end. Joe: That makes sense. How do you actually weave governance into those technical processes? Simla: There are several mechanisms. One key aspect is integrating approvals at critical stages of the AI lifecycle. For example, before a model can be deployed to a production environment, it might require approval from the engineering team and legal and ethics representatives, especially if it's a high-risk system. Joe: So, it creates checkpoints with cross-functional oversight? Simla: Exactly. Another way to embed governance is through checklists at key stages. Before training, a data scientist might confirm that the data is anonymized and documented. Before deployment, they might ensure model documentation is complete and performance meets required thresholds. As discussed earlier, integrating the system registry into the deployment pipeline ensures every AI system is recorded correctly, including key characteristics and risk classification, supporting ongoing monitoring and management. Joe: So, does the deployment process itself trigger an update to the inventory of AI systems? Simla: Precisely. And perhaps the most fundamental way to embed governance is through documentation steps integrated directly into the development and deployment pipelines. For example, as part of the model development process, the pipeline might automatically trigger the creation or updating of the model card. Joe: Automating some of these documentation steps would make governance much less burdensome for the technical teams. Simla: Absolutely. The goal is to make governance as seamless and integrated as possible, rather than adding a lot of manual overhead. Joe: You mentioned lightweight versus heavyweight governance models. What's the difference there, and when might you choose one over the other? Simla: That's about the level of formality and the intensity of the governance processes. A lightweight governance model might be suitable for lower-risk AI applications or organizations just starting their governance journey. It might involve simpler documentation, fewer mandatory approvals, and less formal oversight. Joe: So, maybe a small startup using AI for internal productivity tools might start with a lightweight model? Simla: That's a good example. On the other hand, a heavyweight governance model would be more appropriate for organizations dealing with high-risk AI in heavily regulated industries, like finance or healthcare. This would involve more rigorous documentation, multiple layers of approvals, detailed audit trails, and potentially independent oversight. The focus here is on minimizing risk and ensuring strict compliance. Joe: So, a large bank using AI for fraud detection would likely need a heavyweight model? Simla: Exactly. The choice between lightweight and heavyweight depends on the AI's potential impact, the regulatory environment, your organization's risk appetite, and its governance maturity. It's not one-size-fits-all; Organizations should tailor the model to their needs. Joe: That makes sense. It's about finding the right balance between control and agility, depending on the situation. Simla: Precisely. The key is to start somewhere and iterate, gradually embedding more robust governance mechanisms as the organization's use of AI scales and becomes more critical.

2. Let's practice!

Create Your Free Account

or

By continuing, you accept our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy and that your data is stored in the USA.